MICHIGAN MISCONDUCT.........
A blog about misconduct and corruption in Michigan impacting Michigan's legal, judicial systems and the American political system
Showing posts with label Livingson County. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Livingson County. Show all posts
Missing court record calls into question the Romney families role. Court record carrying the Romney family name mysteriously ended up missing out of Livingston County Courts. Poof! - gone! Clerks searched high and low when questioned about the missing record, but it was gone - not to be found.
The lack of ethics and conscience by the Livingston County court and their entanglement with Livingston county leadership and political friendships endangers the safety of families and their children, putting in peril the personal welfare of anyone who falls under their shadow. This has not only harmed us, but threatens all of the counties citizens and can have an impact on our nation.
UPDATE: “When your own kids are your collateral damage, its time to hang it up-Satan has destroyed your soul.” – Roseanne Barr
Our children had become "collateral damage" to members of the Skousen family, and unhappily to some of my own family members, and to heavy hitters within Livingston County – as we dealt with cover-ups and cruelty within Livingston county and its court system. With many of the links going back to Romney family and their close supporters in Livingston County, as well as some of their friends in Michigan. Mitt Romney gave an exclusive to Steve Garagiola, the husband of Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola during the time she was handling my case. Steve is a Detroit Channel Four newscaster. Judge Garagiola stated in court, she didn’t care if she left my son and I homeless.
Steven Jentzen, an attorney I had hired, put in a motion in court, then failed to notify me of the court date, and Jentzen failed to show up to the hearing making me default in court. I later learned, Steven Jentzen was an attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund and during the time Jentzen was representing me, he also was handling a case against Eastern Michigan University with David French, the head attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund. Later, my research showed David French is the head of Evangelicals for Mitt Romney. It didn't stop there – My home was put in foreclosure, meaning there would be no promised financial settlement.
Julie Fischer, the sister-in-law of DAVID T. FISCHER, taped a letter to my home stating she would be selling my foreclosed home – DAVID T. FISCHER is a close Romney family friend and was Mitt Romney's Michigan bundler during Mitts run for president in 2008 and currently Fischer is the Michigan Finance Co-Chairman for Mitt Romney for president 2012.
My ex had made a dirty deal and tried to hide the ‘deal’ from me, if he covered-up a sexual assault of one our children (which happened while at his home), the court would help leave me destitute to protect one of their own -- making my child and all of our children collateral damage for these past years - all of us are and have been mere barter.
UPDATE ON ROMNEY AND FORECLOSURES:
Romney is for fraudulent foreclosures, it must be so his major campaign bundlers can run foreclosure sells on the homes of the victims of the Romney's
Romney supports robo- signing which has had numerous problems with people losing their homes due to bank errors.
Early one morning, as the Repeal and Replace Movement, moved from the birthing room into the media limelight, one of the first names I heard on the news was Mike Rogers from Michigan. Mike was making a statement supporting the movement. “No shock”, I thought. “Romney’s puppy is out nipping at ankles.”
A Livingston County Republican ‘who knows’ Mike, has posted on the blog, "Mike did not endorse any candidate during the primaries in 2008". However, members of his close knit and influential county family did support Romney. Rogers appears to possess life-long political ambitions and seemed to be playing politics, not wanting to get on the bad side of any Republican presidential hopefuls and waited to toss his hat into the ring, until after the primary dust settled.
While in Dallas on Mar 19, 2010 Mitt Romney laid out his plan to repeal the health-care bill, later citing the 10th amendment as the bases. Mitt Romney, who is the grandfather of the health-care bill, now attempts to become the darling of the conservative republicans with his repeal-and-replace plan. Mitt always creates his own drama, by being the catalyst of an issue and then rushes in to be the ‘savior,’ from the issues he assisted in creating.
David Frum wasn’t buying what he was hearing --
Frum questioned Republicans lack of in-put into the health-care bill Obama signed into law. In David Frum’s March 21 article, he outlined several points why the health-care bill might becomes republicans ‘Waterloo’. The second point, I suggest, became the reason for Frum’s own Waterloo when he wrote:
“So what? Legislative majorities come and go. This healthcare bill is forever. A win in November is very poor compensation for this debacle now”
Frum’s second point, from appearance is expanded into his March 23 article, on the “fantasy” of the repeal- and replace- movement. Frum writes:
“Mitt Romney and Sen. Bob Bennett of Utah, have both come under intense attack from the party’s activist base. Bennett faces a very serious primary challenge; Romney has run away from his own handiwork. Who wants to share their fate?”
“So the question should be pressed as Republicans speak of “replacement”: who is in charge of the process of drafting this replacement? What’s the deadline for completion? My guess is that there won’t be answers to those questions, that “replacement” will remain a more or less empty slogan through the 2010 elections”
David Frum’s words must have been a slap in the face to Romney. The movement which is to be Romney’s salvation was torpedoed by one of the Republican’s most prominent writers.
On March 26th, David Frum, during lunch with AEI President Arthur Brooks, was terminated. The generous money donators’ to AEI had decided to put their money elsewhere and not in Frum direction.
Less than two weeks from Mitt announced plan of repeal and replace, Frum was out the door of AEI.
Meanwhile back in Livingston County,Michigan Congressman Mike Rogers’s stomping ground; one Livingston County GOPer is quoted regarding David Frum:
“Man, that guy is a serious downer.” “I can totally see now why he's fired all the time.”
Does it seem unfair to point a finger in Mitt’s direction for Frum’s dismissal? Not really, others have run into steep head winds when going against an agenda of Mitts, or put Romney’ actions into question. To disagree with Romney had serious consequences -- even for people who appear to have a ‘liberal’ view.
Steve Hindi in the video below disagreed with Romney over a ‘rodeo’. O.K. it is a rodeo, many people may never have been to a rodeo, some may like them, and some may not. It is a rodeo, but it was serious business to Romney.
Guess who showed up in jackets with “Olympics" blazed across the back, while Steve Hindi was being accused of being a terrorist. You read that right, accused of being a TERRORIST! --- PLUS allegations of bomb threats! incite riots? We’re talking serious terrorist here, Romney doesn’t’ take someone disagreeing with him lightly!!
Obviously, there was influence used in the harassment of Steve Hindi. FBI agents bailing and leaving the New Mexico police looking like fools. Undue pressures and influence can come from within the agency by Mormon administrators favorable to members of their own faith, as in the case of Hispanic FBI agents which filed a law suit against the agency.
“Three hundred-eleven His¬panic FBI agents won a class action suit against the agency on September 30. A central argument in the suit was that their careers were stymied by the religious bias against non-Mormons of ranking FBI officials who are Mormon (LDS).
“Charges of a “Mormon Mafia” in the FBI’s Los Angeles office have been circulating for years, The FBI, admitting the dis¬crimination practices and pledging to end them with the recent appointment of a new director, had no plans to appeal the ruling.”
“Just after the case was filed, Richard T. Bretzing, 49, head of the Los Angeles divi¬sion of the FBI since 1982, retired to become the Manag¬ing Director of the LDS Church’s security department, according to the LDS Church News. Bretzing retired after 27 years’ service (three years short of the 30-year government retirement plan).”
Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled in March, the government has violated a 1978 federal stature requiring court approval for domestic surveillance. “Under the program, the National Security Agency monitored Americans’ international e-mail messagesand phone calls without court approval, even though the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, required warrants.”
FISA warrants? Aren’t they the warrants Congressman Mike Rogers of Michigan voted to remove?
Rogers on his website boast about his role in the development of wiretaps, some of which are now found illegal by a U.S. Courts of Law. To quote Rogers: “In Congress, in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Mike’s expertise was sought out during development of the USA PATRIOT Act, which gives law enforcement the tools necessary for tracking terrorists with today’s technology. Mike’s expertise proved invaluable in understanding how wiretaps are obtained and used, the complex checks and balances that prevent abuse of wire taps, and why the rules based on 1970s technology were no longer applicable in the day of cell phones and the Internet.”
Mike voted:
..... YES on removing need for FISA warrant for wiretapping
“The ruling delivered a blow to the Bush administration’s claims that its surveillance program, which Mr. Bush secretly authorized shortly after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, was lawful. Under the program, the National Security Agency monitored Americans’ international e-mail messages and phone calls without court approval, even though the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, required warrants.”
Not good news for Congressman Mike Rogers’s judgment, understanding, or expertise on wiretapping.
Guess, the 1970’s federal program is applicable in today’s world.
Rogers is from Livingston County, Michigan, a county whose GOP leadership has been in an endless love affair with Mitt since the start of his last failed presidential run. Romney won the Saturday, March. 11, 2006 "straw vote in Livingston County, Mich., a fast-growing exurban county near Detroit, Romney won a straw poll of GOP activists, according to Michigan Republican Party chairman Saul Anuzis who was in Memphis.” “He estimated that about 400 people had taken part in the Michigan straw poll.”
Rogers’s involvement in the wiretapping and the March court ruling of Judge Vaughn R. Walker got me thinking about Mitt Romney’s view on enhanced tortures, which lead to the April 12th blog piece. The enhanced torture program followed on the heels of the Patriot Act of 2001.
Rogers and Romney have close associations, are touched on in the blog piece: “Mitt Romney, Mark Foley and Congressman Mike Rogers from Michigan” Can be located on the side bar in the March blogs, or http://mittromney2012potus.blogspot.com/2010/03/mitt-romney-mark-foley-and-congressman.html
